The Power of Poplar, the Biofuel Tree


My parents never saw much use for the poplar trees in our backyard. They provided excessive amounts of shade, turning one corner of the yard into a mossy mess. Their root systems were meandering and ill-mannered, reaching out just below the soil to upset fences and brick walkways, and their weak, spongy wood sent massive limbs crashing to the ground with every major storm. 

But it seems that poplars, despite my parents’ insistence to the contrary, could turn out to be very useful someday. Since the first fuel shocks of the 1970s, Jon Johnson, currently a researcher at Washington State University, has been studying the near-ubiquitous tree, also known as cottonwood, as a biofuel resource to combat both high gasoline prices and global warming.

Poplars do exhibit some very desirable biocrop traits: they grow quickly, reaching maturity (70-80 feet high and 10 inches across) in six years. They’ve also shown the ability to grow in some fairly poor soils, and with minimal attention, and energy can be processed from them at cellulosic ethanol plants through a process that, not accounting for energy from fossil fuels, releases no additional carbon dioxide. 

Perhaps it’s this potential that has landed Johnson, along with partner firms ZeaChem and GreenWood Resources, a $583,000 federal grant for his continued study of the poplar tree as an energy source. “Wet chemistry is real expensive to analyze samples, and it takes months,” Johnson said. “It will run to $150 a sample, and you can see if you have only 100 samples, it is way beyond budget. The spectrography can be done in seconds, and it will give you a variety of readings.” Though methods such as these, Johnson and the two companies hope to find the most suitable poplar hybrids and extract energy from them.

While I like the use of this non-food crop for biolfuel research, I do have some reservations about the poplar project. The plants must still be cultivated on a large scale, requiring some form of mechanized agriculture.  This is especially pertinent considering that out every thousand plants grown, only “two or three might show hybrid vigor” and be grown to maturity. While it might not create the same footprint as the massively industrialized corn ethanol process, there’s still plenty of carbon involved the in the creation of poplar ethanol to be accounted for. 

Additionally, fully-grown trees are a tremendous carbon sink. Carbon impact reduction through reforestation is one of the few facets of global warming mitigation in which the US is currently a world leader.  Gains made in harvesting the plants for fuel now need to be weighed against the carbon reduction that the plant might account for over a lifespan that can reach upwards of 50 years.

Still, on many important fronts, poplars represent an exciting new potential biocrop, with a mature plantation yielding three times the ethanol per acre of an industrial corn crop.  Combined with a still-reduced carbon footprint, and with a very limited impact on the global food supply, poplar ethanol may yet play an important role in determining America’s green energy future. 

Related articles:
Sweet Sorghum a Biofuel Solution?">Sweet Sorghum a Biofuel Solution?
Jatropha: The Best Bet For Biodiesel?
Making Biodiesel From Shrimp

 

Photo by Flickr user Dano

This entry was:

Share This Story



Related Entries



Read More Articles »

TrackBacks

Robert wrote related post
Silk posts and stories

TrackBack URL: http://featured.matternetwork.com/trackback.cfm?029B7B56-BCEA-ADCE-4850F28BC18172D5
 

Comments

A noble effort to be sure, but I do not understand why we are still spending such huge sums of money on cellulosic ethanol research, none of which is proven beyond lab scale, when we can use the same efficient biomass with proven thermochemical technologies (which are all compatible with existing CCS technology, enabling carbon negative fuels) and produce diesel and jet fuel using off the shelf technology.

Let's save the ethanol for drinking.

"and energy can be processed from them at cellulosic ethanol plants through a process that, <B>not accounting for energy from fossil fuels</B>, releases no additional carbon dioxide."

"not accounting for energy from fossil fuels" is more of the same intellectually dishonest lifecycle greenhouse gas accounting that makes conventional first gen biofuels like corn ethanol or soy biodiesel appear good, when they are in fact worse than the fuels that they are replacing. If we want to not repeat those same mistakes, we have to look at _ALL_ lifecycle GHG impacts, including fossil fuels and fertilizers used throughout the whole lifecycle, and land use change impacts.

Another fantastic bio-energy crop that will be ideal for second generation biofuels will be miscanthus. See miscanthus.uiuc.edu.
Posted By Stephen F. Johnson on July 08, 2008 at 07:18 PM

Post a Comment