Energy | February 21, 2009 |
Could U.S. Follow South Africa With Feed-in Tariff?
The democratic majority in Congress has turned an interest in renewable energy into decisive legislative action through the stimulus package. A national feed-in tariff (FiT), which is gaining momentum in South Africa, might soon be debated in Congress.
South Africa, which has a government energy monopoly and cheap coal, is nonetheless considering a FiT to encourage private entities to join the renewable energy game. The big challenges to growing renewables there are the low proposed tariff (about 66c/kWh) compared to the amount that some say is needed (1.5 Rand per kWh), and the indifference for clean power from dominant power producer Eskom. If a FiT law can succeed in South Africa, then there's no reason why it shouldn't pass here given the current climate in Congress.
Feed-in tariffs, which have been wildly successful in creating renewable energy markets in Germany, Spain and Denmark, are gaining interest here. Gainesville, Florida recently passed the first FiT in the nation for solar. Earlier this month a bill to create a FiT was introduced in Washington State, and Michigan and Illinois have also considered similar measures.
Last year, progressive Washington Congressman Jay Inslee sponsored a bill for a national FiT (see HR 6401 below) , with the tariff rate to be determined by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Thus far Congress has preferred to enact production tax credits, which provide a write-off for investments in renewable energy capacity, to feed-in tariffs which directly pay energy producers for each kilowatt hour of clean energy produced.
Under Inslee's plan, additional tariff premiums would be paid for electricity produced from biogas from animal waste (appeasing rural constituents) and to facilities that also include energy storage.
The stimulus package extended the production tax credits for another three years, and provided loan guarantees for up to $6 billion in renewable energy and transmission upgrade projects.
While this will encourage the development of large scale renewable energy projects, a feed-in tariff would increase the likelihood that corporations and individuals would add wind and solar power generation.


Comments By Readers
I hadn't heard of the concept of a feed-in tariff before. Thanks for writing about it. It is certainly an interesting idea and I agree that it would encourage the private sector to add to clean energy generation.
Hopefully Congress will actually choose to open up a discussion about this. Now that they have passed the stimulus package, they should be able to move on to issues like this.
I saw that the Friends of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is still asking people to give their opinion on the most important thing for Congress to do next. Then they are going to focus their efforts on getting Congress to accomplish what we actually want them to do.
What do the other readers think Congress should do? Should they pass a feed-in tariff? Should they work on other methods of encouraging clean energy production? Or should they focus their efforts on completely different areas? Make sure to add your opinion so Congress can know what we want them to do next - http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/email/email4.cfm?id=200
Post Your Comment